This question allows checking several key skills:
Communication — can you argumentatively defend design decisions?
Collaboration — are you able to find compromises with the team and stakeholders?
Flexibility — can you reconsider your position if objections are justified?
Empathy — do you understand the motives of those who disagree with you?
How to answer this question:Use the structure "Objection → Your reaction → Result" and give an example using the STAR method.
Example answer"I believe that objections are part of a healthy process. My strategy:
First, I listen and clarify. For example, if a PM says: 'This interface is too complex,' I ask: 'Which specific steps seem unnecessary?' or 'What data concerns you?'
I provide arguments. If the objection is subjective, I rely on research (usability tests, metrics, best practices). For example, in one project, the client wanted to remove the progress bar from a form, but I showed an A/B test where it reduced the percentage of abandoned carts.
I look for compromise. If the objection is justified, I propose alternatives. For example, developers said the animation would take too long to implement — we simplified it together while preserving the essence."
What objections you can mention:From product manager: "This doesn’t match our metrics" →
Answer: "I show how design affects KPIs (for example, reduces task completion time)"
From developers: "This is impossible to implement on time" →
Answer: "I simplify the solution without losing value (for example, replace custom component with library one)"
From stakeholder/CEO: "I don’t like this" →
Answer: "I translate subjective assessment into objective criteria ('Which specific elements cause discomfort?')"
What to avoid- "I'm always right, they just don’t understand" — sounds like lack of flexibility.
- "I agree with everyone just to avoid arguing" — shows weak position.