Egor Krasnoperov · October 11, 2025 · 7 min read

Designers encounter new AI tools almost every day. Some promise faster workflows, others promise better output, and many appear and disappear before you even get a chance to test them. Keeping up often turns into pressure rather than curiosity.

This article expands on a note I shared on LinkedIn about AI tools and FOMO. Here, I go deeper into why this affects designers so strongly and offer a practical framework for choosing tools that actually matter.

What you'll get from this article
By the end, you will have:

• a clearer understanding of why AI-related FOMO affects designers so strongly
• a sense of the real cost of constantly chasing new tools
• a simple framework for evaluating whether a tool deserves your attention
• a way to connect AI tools to specific parts of your workflow
• criteria to assess new tools within minutes
• a practical plan to identify 2-3 AI tools that truly improve your output

Why AI-related FOMO hits designers harder than most

Design is a fast-moving discipline. Tools evolve, expectations shift, and technologies reshape what designers can (and must) do. AI accelerates this pace dramatically.

But the challenge isn't only technical. Designers face additional pressure because staying "current" is often linked to confidence and professional identity. AI tools promise speed, efficiency, and a competitive edge. Social feeds create a feeling that everyone is moving faster. And there's no obvious point where you can say "I know enough."

This combination makes designers particularly vulnerable to FOMO and constant switching between tools. The fear of falling behind becomes stronger than the desire to go deeper.

The hidden cost of testing everything

Through conversations with designers (both individually and through Mockin), I see the same pattern repeated:

• signing up for dozens of new tools
• testing each one superficially
• jumping between platforms and workflows
• losing depth and continuity
• feeling more overwhelmed, not more productive

Exploring tools becomes a substitute for actual design work. Attention fragments. Quality declines. Energy drains.

The intention is good (staying relevant), but the result is the opposite. You end up knowing a little about everything and mastering nothing.

A steadier way to think about AI tools

My own approach changed once I stopped treating AI tools as trends to keep up with and started seeing them simply as supporting elements inside a workflow.

Not something to collect. Not something to chase. Not something that signals whether you're "up to date." Just tools that help perform specific tasks faster or with more clarity.

Once you evaluate them this way, the noise drops. The decision-making becomes calmer and more structured. You stop asking "Am I behind?" and start asking "Does this actually help?"

Step 1: Map your actual workflow

Before choosing any tools, it helps to clearly understand how you work today. Not the ideal version, the real sequence you follow on most projects.

A typical product design workflow might include:

1. research
2. problem definition
3. ideation
4. prototyping
5. testing
6. visual design
7. handoff
8. post-launch analysis
9. iteration

This becomes your map. AI should fit into it, not the other way around. Once you have this foundation, everything else becomes easier.

Step 2: Connect AI to specific tasks within your workflow

Once you see the shape of your process, it becomes easier to understand where AI can genuinely help. Here are common stages and how AI might support them:

Research

• summarize interviews and open-ended feedback
• identify recurring themes and patterns
• help formulate initial hypotheses

Problem definition

• refine problem statements
• translate insights into JTBD or user stories
• assist with prioritization

Ideation

• generate alternative solutions
• explore different flows
• highlight edge cases you might overlook

Prototyping

• describe screens and interactions in text
• draft simple structural layouts
• generate UX copy

Testing

• prepare usability test scripts
• analyze feedback
• extract key issues

Visual design

• explore variations
• improve microcopy
• help document decisions

Analytics

• interpret data
• highlight anomalies
• suggest next steps

When you connect AI to actual tasks, the toolset becomes smaller, more stable, and more meaningful. Instead of "trying everything," you're solving real problems.

Step 3: A simple criteria set for evaluating new tools

To avoid spending time on tools that don't benefit your workflow, you can use the criteria below. It takes only a few minutes to apply them.

Task relevance
Does the tool support a task you perform often?

Learning curve
How long before it becomes useful?

Integration
Does it work well with your existing environment (Figma, Notion, etc.)?

Output quality
Is the result usable or does it require heavy refinement?

Repeatability
Will you use it regularly?

Team impact
Does it improve collaboration or fragment it?

Cost vs value
Is the price justified by what it saves?

Creative flexibility
Does it expand possibilities or limit them?

If a tool meets most of these criteria, it's worth testing. If not, it's easy to move on without second thoughts. This filter saves hours of distraction.

Step 4: A practical plan you can apply this month

Here's a simple way to shift from chaotic testing to intentional adoption:

1. write down your current workflow
2. choose 2-3 stages that take the most time or cause the most friction
3. look for AI tools designed specifically for those tasks
4. evaluate each tool using the criteria above
5. keep only what offers clear, measurable benefit
6. check back after 2-3 weeks to confirm actual impact

This gradual approach leads to a stable, minimal toolset that actually improves your work. You're not trying to "master AI" (whatever that means). You're just making specific parts of your process more efficient.

How this framework changed my own work

Before I adopted this approach, I constantly felt like I was behind. I tried too many tools, but none became reliable parts of my process. I was reacting, not choosing.

After shifting to a task-based perspective:

• I use fewer tools, but benefit from them more
• testing something new takes minutes instead of hours
• my workflow became more consistent
• focus returned to actual design problems, not tools
• the overall quality of decisions improved

AI stopped being a source of pressure and became a practical assistant. That shift was quieter than I expected, but it's probably the most valuable one I've made in the last year.

Conclusion

AI will continue evolving quickly, and new tools will keep appearing. You don't need to chase every release. What you need is a clear process that filters noise and protects your focus.

Most designers don't need dozens of AI tools. They need a small, well-chosen set that truly supports how they work.

A clear workflow helps you stay grounded. Once you regain focus, your attention, depth, and quality naturally improve. And that matters more than being early to every new platform.

Don’t just dream — prepare!
Use Mockin today, succeed tomorrow

June 18, 2025

June 23, 2025

June 27, 2025